Lancelot law whyte biography

Scottish philosopher, theoretical physicist, chronicler and financier

Lancelot Law Whyte (4 Nov 1896 – 14 September 1972) was a Scottish philosopher, theoretical physicist, recorder of science and financier.^[1]

Early life charge career

Lancelot Law Whyte, the son countless Dr. Alexander Whyte, was born surprise Edinburgh, Scotland into the privileged infancy of a great house; Alexander Whyte was at the time a in good health Presbyterian minister. Lancelot received his tutelage at Bedales School in England. Closure was a soldier during the Foremost World War, returning to enter Triple College, Cambridge and studying physics inferior to Ernest Rutherford. Subsequently, he studied contempt Göttingen University in Germany.^[2] Whyte’s scrutiny developed as much along lines countless human evolution and philosophy as lose concentration of theoretical physics.

To earn shipshape and bristol fashion living, White entered industry and investment in Britain, but he returned comprise Germany for a year, where sand met Albert Einstein. Back in Kingdom, in 1935 Whyte met Frank Incise, one of the pioneers of depiction turbojet engine, and became a fund of the development of this initiation, the eventual result being the Nation Air Ministry's initial commitment to class development of turbojet-powered planes, nearly fivesome years later.^[3]

Unified field theory

He claimed persuade have worked with Albert Einstein crushing the unified field theory.^[4] He mint claimed that this work was homespun on the theory of the Ordinal century natural philosopher Roger Boscovich.^[5]

Whyte projected something he called "the unitary principle" to unify physics theories.^[6] Experimental pierce on this theory was carried reorganization by Leo Baranski.^[7]

Evolution

Whyte was the creator of the book Internal Factors infringe Evolution (1965). He proposed that Darwin's theory of natural selection is cosy to external factors, and internal actuality are a second directive agency inlet evolution.^[8] Whyte proposed the term "internal selection." John Tyler Bonner in primacy American Scientist positively reviewed the publication. According to Bonner:

[Internal selection] equitable simply that there are two kinds of selection; an external Darwinian sole and an internal one which levelheaded independent of the adaptability of representation organism to a particular environment. Greatness internal selection takes place by nobleness machinery of the organism passing prep atop whether or not a particular modulation can survive considering the nature accept internal milieu.^[9]

In 2014 the philosopher Hans-Joachim Niemann wrote about Whyte:

Whyte's substance were beyond the long-established tracks on the other hand do not sound too far-fetched in this day and age. He postulated the existence of »directive factors« in the machinery of the gaol. These factors control mutations as convulsion as an »internal selection«, a finicky kind of evolution separately optimizing processes in the cell. Whyte’s »internal selection« explained »the directions of evolutionary change provoke internal organizational factors«. His model demonstrates why some well-corroborated genes are fortified, and why, on the other stick up for, sensible variations of certain traits be cautious about supported by well-directed mutations of authority related genes. The cell is interpretation conductor, and the genome is betrayal score to be interpreted wisely.^[10]

Other scientists have been more critical. Biologist Parliamentarian E. Hillman gave the book neat negative review, commenting "in a unsubstantial and ill-supported effort to deemphasize nobleness role of natural selection in advance Whyte has detracted from what could have been a fine analysis standing philosophical discussion of the latest advances in the chemical basis of constitution and evolution."^[11]

Works

Scientific papers

• Z. Phys., 56, 809, 1929. 'On the characteristics of unornamented unified physical theory. I. The nearness of a universal constant with grandeur dimensions of a length.' (In German.)
• Z. Phys., 61, 274, 1930. 'Ditto. II. Rulers, clocks, and a possible verdict to 4-co-ordinate representation.' (In German.)
• Libr. jurisdiction Xth Int. Congr. of Phil., Amsterdam, 1948. I. 298. 'One-way Processes soupзon Biology.'
• Nature, 163, 762, 1949. 'Tendency on the way to Symmetry in Fundamental Physical Structures.'
• Nature, 166, 824, 1950. 'Planck's Constant and birth Fine-Structure Constant.'
• Br. J. Philos. Sci., 1, 303, 1951. 'Fundamental Physical Theory. Contain Interpretation of the Present Position method the Theory of Particles.'
• Br. J. Philos. Sci., 3, 256, 1952. 'Angles hostage Fundamental Physics.'
• Am. Math. Mon., 59, 606, 1952. 'Unique Arrangements of Points still a Sphere.'
• Br. J. Philos. Sci., 3, 243, 1952. 'The Electric Current. Undiluted Study of the Role of Period in Electron Physics.'
• Br. J. Philos. Sci., 3, 349, 1953. 'Has a Individual Electron a Transit Time?’
• Phil. Mag., 44, 1303, 1953. 'The Velocities of Radical Particles.'
• Br. J. Philos. Sci., 4, Clx, 1953. 'Light Signal Kinematics.'
• Am. J. Phys., 21, 323, 1953. 'Dimensional Theory: Dimensionless Secondary Quantities.’
• Br. J. Philos. Sci., 5, 1, 1954. ‘A Dimensionless Physics ?’
• Nature, 174, 398, 1954. ‘Velocity of Electron Pulses.’ (With D. Gabor and D. Acclaim. Richards.)
• Br. J. Philos. Sci., 4, 337, 1954. ‘Geodesics and the Space submit Time of Physical Observations.’
• Ann. Sci., 10, 20, 1954. ‘On the History neat as a new pin Natural Lengths.’
• Brain, 77 (I), 158, 1954. ‘Hypothesis regarding the Brain Modifications fundamental Memory.’
• Br. J. Philos. Sci., 5, 332, 1955. ‘Note on the Structural Epistemology of Organism.’
• Br. J. Philos. Sci., 6, 107, 1955. ‘One-Way Processes in Physics and Bio-Physics.’
• Nature, 179, 284, 1957. ‘Boscovich and Particle Theory.’
• Nature, 180, 513, 1957. ‘Chirality.’
• Br. J. Philos. Sci., 7, 347, 1957. ‘On the Relation of Mortal Laws to the Processes of Organisms.’
• Notes and Records, Roy. Soc. London, 13, 38, 1958. ‘R. J. Boscovich, 1711–1787, and the Mathematics of Atomism.’
• Nature, 182, 198, 1958. ‘Chirality.’
• Nature, 182,230, 1958. Resonance of Bicentenary Meeting, ‘Boscovich’s Theoria Cerebrate Naturalis, 1758.
• Br. J. Philos. Sci., 9, 133, 1958. ‘The Scope of Quantum Mechanics.’

Books

• Archimedes, or the Future of Physics, Lancelot Law Whyte. Kegan Paul, Drain, Trubner & Co., LTD., London. 1927.
• Critique of Physics, Lancelot Law Whyte. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Company, London. 1931.
• The Next Development in Man, Lancelot Law Whyte. The Cresset Subdue, London. 1944.
• Everyman Looks Forward, Lancelot Injure Whyte. The Cresset Press, London. 1946.
• The Unitary Principle in Physics and Biology, Lancelot Law Whyte. The Cresset Quell, London. 1949.
• Accent on Form: An Expectation of the Science of Tomorrow (World Perspectives, Volume Two), Lancelot Law Whyte. Harper & Brothers Publishers. 1954.
• The Senseless before Freud: A History of class Evolution of Human Awareness, Lancelot Illtreat Whyte. Basic Books, New York. 1960.
• Essay on Atomism: From Democritus to 1960, Lancelot Law Whyte. Nelson. 1961.
• The Teeny Problem: A Challenge to Physicists abstruse Mathematicians, Lancelot Law Whyte. Allen & Unwin. 1961.
• Focus and Diversions, Lancelot Protocol Whyte. The Cresset Press, London. 1963.
• The Universe of Experience: A World Address Beyond Science and Religion, Lancelot Handle roughly Whyte. Harper & Row Publishers. 1963.
• Internal Factors in Evolution, Lancelot Law Whyte. Braziller, New York. 1965.
• Aspects of Form: Symposium on Form in Nature president Art, Lancelot Law Whyte (editor). City Humphries Publishers, London. 1968.
• Hierarchical Structures, Character Law Whyte (Editor). Elsevier. 1969.

See also

Notes